Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Radeon R9 M385X
Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R9 M385X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R9 M385X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R9 M385X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $245 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 439.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R9 M385X
2015Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Xe MAX Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 M385X is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌445.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R9 M385X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Radeon R9 M385X
The Radeon R9 M385X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,994 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics scores 1,972 and the Radeon R9 M385X reaches 1,994 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is built on Generation 12.1 while the Radeon R9 M385X uses GCN 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385X). Raw compute: 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385X). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,972 | 1,994+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 896+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.534 TFLOPS+29% | 1.971 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+50% | 1100 MHz |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 56+17% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385X carries 512 MB. Radeon R9 M385X gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M385X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M385X) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M385X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M385X). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 M385X).
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics draws 25W versus the Radeon R9 M385X's 75W — a 100% difference. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385X). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-67% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 78.9+197% | 26.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics came in at $55, while the Radeon R9 M385X launched at $300. On MSRP, Iris Xe MAX Graphics was 81.7% cheaper ($245 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.9 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 6.6 (Radeon R9 M385X) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers 443.9% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe MAX Graphics (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-82% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.9+444% | 6.6 |
| Codename | DG1 | Strato |
| Release | October 31 2020 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #686 | #681 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R9 M385X
