CPU
GPU
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is positioned at rank #139 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
| Insight | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $40 for the Iris Xe MAX Graphics, it costs 63% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 170.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+170.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics scores 1,972 and the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) reaches 2,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is built on Generation 12.1 while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on a 10 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,972 | 2,000+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+1100% | 64 |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+50% | 1100 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Decoder: QuickSync vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)).
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | QuickSync |
| Decoder | QuickSync | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics draws 25W versus the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)'s 12W — a 70.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 12W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 78.9 | 166.7+111% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics launched at $55 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) launched at $0 and now averages $15. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.3 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 133.3 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) — the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers 170.4% better value. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $15-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.3 | 133.3+170% |
| Codename | DG1 | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
| Release | October 31 2020 | May 28 2019 |
| Ranking | #686 | #672 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
