Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is positioned at rank #139 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 535.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
| Insight | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-535.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+535.6%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $209 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 21.7% better value per dollar than the Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
| Insight | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+21.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe MAX Graphics and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics scores 1,972 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 535.6%. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is built on Generation 12.1 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 10 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,972 | 12,535+536% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.534 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+259% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1777 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 48 | 80+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 135.5% difference. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 66°C.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-81% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 66°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 78.9 | 96.4+22% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics launched at $55 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics costs 80.9% less ($169 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.3 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 21.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-78% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-81% | $209 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.3 | 60.0+22% |
| Codename | DG1 | GA106 |
| Release | October 31 2020 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #686 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe MAX Graphics and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
