Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce GTX 460 SE

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

25

1,972

0.0%

1,988

+0.8%

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX 1080

TITAN V

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is positioned at rank #139 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe MAX Graphics

#39

Radeon RX 7700S

MSRP: $449|Avg: $350

96%

#129

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

303%

#131

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

275%

#132

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

274%

#136

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

249%

#137

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

247%

#139

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

100%

#145

Radeon RX 580 (móvel)

MSRP: $229|Avg: $65

97%

#147

GeForce GT 630M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35

97%

#150

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The Iris Xe MAX Graphics likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 SE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 460 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe MAX Graphics.

Insight	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	GeForce GTX 460 SE
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the GeForce GTX 460 SE, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 24% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	GeForce GTX 460 SE
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+24%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 460 SE Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe MAX Graphics and GeForce GTX 460 SE

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.

GeForce GTX 460 SE

The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics scores 1,972 and the GeForce GTX 460 SE reaches 1,988 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is built on Generation 12.1 while the GeForce GTX 460 SE uses Fermi, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Raw compute: 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 SE).

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	GeForce GTX 460 SE
G3D Mark Score	1,972	1,988
Architecture	Generation 12.1	Fermi
Process Node	10 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	768+167%	288
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.534 TFLOPS+238%	0.7488 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	48	48
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	GeForce GTX 460 SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 460 SE offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460 SE) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	GeForce GTX 460 SE
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	1 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	GeForce GTX 460 SE
DirectX	12.1	12.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 460 SE).

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	GeForce GTX 460 SE
Encoder	QuickSync	UVD 4.0
Decoder	QuickSync	PureVideo VP4
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 460 SE's 150W — a 142.9% difference. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	GeForce GTX 460 SE
TDP	25W-83%	150W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	450W
Power Connector	Integrated	2x 6-pin
Length	0mm	210mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80	80°C
Perf/Watt	78.9+493%	13.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics launched at $55 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE launched at $160 and now averages $50. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.3 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 39.8 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers 23.9% better value. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).