Quadro FX 3500 vs RTX A1000 Mobile

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3500 vs RTX A1000 Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3500 vs RTX A1000 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3500

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A1000 Mobile across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌215% higher power demand at 189W vs 60W.

RTX A1000 Mobile

2022

Why buy it

✅1160.9% more average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 60W instead of 189W, a 129W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX A1000 Mobile is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1160.9% in average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3470.9% in PassMark G3D (9,463 vs 265), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A1000 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 55nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 3500 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 3500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX A1000 Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3500 vs RTX A1000 Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3500

The Quadro FX 3500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $3,499.

RTX A1000 Mobile

The RTX A1000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,463 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3500 scores 265 versus the RTX A1000 Mobile's 9,463 — the RTX A1000 Mobile leads by 3470.9%. The Quadro FX 3500 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RTX A1000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 55 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Mobile). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Mobile).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	RTX A1000 Mobile
G3D Mark Score	265	9,463+3471%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	55 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	240	2048+753%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	4.669 TFLOPS+651%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+25%	64
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A1000 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	RTX A1000 Mobile
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3500 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 Mobile carries 4 GB. RTX A1000 Mobile gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500 and 128-bit on the RTX A1000 Mobile. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3500) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000 Mobile) — the RTX A1000 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	RTX A1000 Mobile
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	4 GB+1500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3500 draws 189W versus the RTX A1000 Mobile's 60W — a 103.6% difference. The RTX A1000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3500) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	RTX A1000 Mobile
TDP	189W	60W-68%
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	1.4	157.7+11164%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX A1000 Mobile (2022 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	RTX A1000 Mobile
MSRP	$1599	—
Codename	GT200B	GA107
Release	November 11 2008	March 30 2022
Ranking	#815	#277

Search Quadro FX 3500 on Amazon

Search RTX A1000 Mobile on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.