
Quadro FX 3700 vs GeForce 9800M GT

Quadro FX 3700
Popular choices:

GeForce 9800M GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3700 is positioned at rank 401 and the GeForce 9800M GT is on rank 622, so the Quadro FX 3700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9800M GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 3700.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce 9800M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9800M GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9800M GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $500), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 10141.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce 9800M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10141.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3700 and GeForce 9800M GT

Quadro FX 3700
The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.

GeForce 9800M GT
The GeForce 9800M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3700 scores 372 and the GeForce 9800M GT reaches 381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 9800M GT uses G9x, both on 55 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 224 (GeForce 9800M GT).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce 9800M GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 372 | 381+2% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+7% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce 9800M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce 9800M GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9800M GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce 9800M GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3700 draws 189W versus the GeForce 9800M GT's 150W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 9800M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3700) vs 350W (GeForce 9800M GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce 9800M GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 150W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 2.5+25% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 3700 launched at $1599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce 9800M GT launched at $160 and now averages $5. The GeForce 9800M GT costs 99% less ($495 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.7 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 76.2 (GeForce 9800M GT) — the GeForce 9800M GT offers 10785.7% better value.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce 9800M GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599 | $160-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $5-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.7 | 76.2+10786% |
| Codename | GT200B | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | November 11 2008 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #815 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















