
Quadro FX 3700 vs GeForce GT 335M

Quadro FX 3700
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 335M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3700 is positioned at rank 401 and the GeForce GT 335M is on rank 131, so the GeForce GT 335M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 335M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 3700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 335M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 335M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 335M holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $500), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1878.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1878.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3700 and GeForce GT 335M

Quadro FX 3700
The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.

GeForce GT 335M
The GeForce GT 335M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 368 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3700 scores 372 and the GeForce GT 335M reaches 368 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GT 335M uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 384 (GeForce GT 335M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 335M).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 372+1% | 368 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 384+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.7526 TFLOPS+21% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 335M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 335M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 335M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 11.1 (10_1)+11% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3700 draws 189W versus the GeForce GT 335M's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The GeForce GT 335M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3700) vs 350W (GeForce GT 335M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 50W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 7.4+270% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 335M costs 95% less ($475 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.7 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 14.7 (GeForce GT 335M) — the GeForce GT 335M offers 2000% better value. The GeForce GT 335M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $25-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.7 | 14.7+2000% |
| Codename | GT200B | GK107 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | June 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #815 | #726 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















