Quadro FX 3700 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3850
Quadro FX 3700
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3700 is positioned at rank 401 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is on rank 620, so the Quadro FX 3700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3850
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 3700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 3850.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3700 | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $500), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 3179.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3700 | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3179.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3700 and Mobility Radeon HD 3850
Quadro FX 3700
The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 366 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3700 scores 372 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 reaches 366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3850). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3850).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 372+2% | 366 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 800+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+80% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3700 draws 189W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3850's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3700) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3850). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 50W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 7.3+265% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 3700 launched at $1599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 launched at $150 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 costs 97% less ($485 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.7 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 24.4 (Mobility Radeon HD 3850) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 offers 3385.7% better value. The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599 | $150-91% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $15-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.7 | 24.4+3386% |
| Codename | GT200B | Broadway |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #815 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 3700 and Mobility Radeon HD 3850
