Quadro FX 3700 vs Quadro FX 2700M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3700 is positioned at rank 401 and the Quadro FX 2700M is on rank 237, so the Quadro FX 2700M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700

#385

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

64230%

#400

Quadro FX 4700 X2

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15

100%

#401

Quadro FX 3700

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500

100%

#402

GRID M10-0B

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000

96%

#403

Quadro FX 4600

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50

87%

#405

GRID K340

MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57

87%

#406

Quadro FX 5600

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50

78%

#408

Quadro FX 3500

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

74%

#409

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

70%

#410

GRID K1

MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120

70%

#412

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

52%

#413

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

43%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2700M

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

99%

#102

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500

87%

#103

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999

80%

#104

Radeon Pro W6900X

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000

79%

#105

Quadro RTX 6000

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800

77%

#222

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

4025%

#237

Quadro FX 2700M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#238

FirePro 3D V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

100%

#240

Quadro K600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

99%

#241

FirePro S7000

MSRP: $1249|Avg: $40

99%

#242

Quadro P5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

98%

#243

FirePro V7000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $100

96%

#244

Quadro P500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

90%

#246

FireStream 9370

MSRP: $800|Avg: $50

86%

#247

GRID K260Q

MSRP: $937|Avg: $15

86%

#249

Quadro 600

MSRP: $179|Avg: $20

80%

#251

Quadro 410

MSRP: $149|Avg: $25

78%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 3700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 2700M.

Insight	Quadro FX 3700	Quadro FX 2700M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 3700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 3700 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 2700M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3700 and Quadro FX 2700M

Quadro FX 3700

The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Quadro FX 2700M

The Quadro FX 2700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 367 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3700 scores 372 and the Quadro FX 2700M reaches 367 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 2700M uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2700M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700M).

Feature	Quadro FX 3700	Quadro FX 2700M
G3D Mark Score	372+1%	367
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	240	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3700	Quadro FX 2700M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Quadro FX 3700	Quadro FX 2700M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3700 draws 189W versus the Quadro FX 2700M's 189W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX 2700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3700) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.