Quadro FX 4000 vs Radeon HD 6290

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 4000 vs Radeon HD 6290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 4000 vs Radeon HD 6290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 4000

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 375W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6290 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
4298% HIGHER MSRP
$2,199 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6290

2011

Why buy it

✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $2,149 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 4472.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌150% higher power demand at 375W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6290 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4% in PassMark G3D (105 vs 101), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6290 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,149 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $2,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4472.2% (2.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6290 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 4000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 4000 vs Radeon HD 6290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 4000

The Quadro FX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 101 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon HD 6290

The Radeon HD 6290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 4000 scores 101 and the Radeon HD 6290 reaches 105 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4000 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6290 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4000) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6290). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4000) vs 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6290).

Feature	Quadro FX 4000	Radeon HD 6290
G3D Mark Score	101	105+4%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	192	1536 ×2+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	2.55 TFLOPS ×2+452%
ROPs	24	32 ×2+33%
TMUs	64	96 ×2+50%
L2 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 4000	Radeon HD 6290
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 4000 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6290 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6290 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4000 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6290. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 4000) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6290) — the Radeon HD 6290 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 4000	Radeon HD 6290
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 4000 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6290's 375W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro FX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4000) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6290). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 4000	Radeon HD 6290
TDP	150W-60%	375W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Temp (Load)	—	65°C
Perf/Watt	0.7+133%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 4000 came in at $2199, while the Radeon HD 6290 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6290 was 97.7% cheaper ($2149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (Quadro FX 4000) vs 2.1 (Radeon HD 6290) — the Radeon HD 6290 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 6290 (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 4000	Radeon HD 6290
MSRP	$2199	$50-98%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	2.1
Codename	GT200B	Antilles
Release	November 11 2008	March 8 2011
Ranking	#884	#583

Search Quadro FX 4000 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6290 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.