Quadro K3000M vs Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H
Quadro K3000M
Popular choices:
Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K3000M is positioned at rank 79 and the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H is on rank 361, so the Quadro K3000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K3000M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K3000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K3000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H.
| Insight | Quadro K3000M | Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Vega (2017−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K3000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K3000M and Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H
Quadro K3000M
The Quadro K3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 654 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,618 points. Launch price was $155.
Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H
The Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2020. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 2100 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,595 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K3000M scores 1,618 and the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H reaches 1,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K3000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H uses Vega, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 576 (Quadro K3000M) vs 512 (Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H).
| Feature | Quadro K3000M | Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,618+1% | 1,595 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Vega |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 576+13% | 512 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K3000M | Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K3000M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H has 0 MB. The Quadro K3000M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro K3000M | Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K3000M draws 75W versus the Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K3000M) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro K3000M | Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 21.6 | 106.3+392% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro K3000M | Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $45 |
| Codename | GK104 | Vega |
| Release | June 1 2012 | January 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #748 | #545 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K3000M and Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H
