Quadro K4200 vs GRID V100D-8Q
Quadro K4200
Popular choices:
GRID V100D-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID V100D-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K4200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID V100D-8Q.
| Insight | Quadro K4200 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K4200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K4200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $10,000), it costs 100% less, resulting in a 20747% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K4200 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20747%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K4200 and GRID V100D-8Q
Quadro K4200
The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.
GRID V100D-8Q
The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K4200 scores 4,332 and the GRID V100D-8Q reaches 4,156 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4200 is built on Kepler while the GRID V100D-8Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K4200) vs 640 (GRID V100D-8Q). Raw compute: 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q). Boost clocks: 784 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,332+4% | 4,156 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+110% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.107 TFLOPS+26% | 1.672 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 784 MHz | 1306 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+180% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 320 KB+186% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K4200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID V100D-8Q has 2 GB. The Quadro K4200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K4200) vs 2 MB (GRID V100D-8Q) — the GRID V100D-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K4200 draws 108W versus the GRID V100D-8Q's 225W — a 70.3% difference. The Quadro K4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4200) vs 350W (GRID V100D-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 108W-52% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 40.1+117% | 18.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K4200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID V100D-8Q launched at $10000 and now averages $10000. The Quadro K4200 costs 99.5% less ($9950 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 86.6 (Quadro K4200) vs 0.4 (GRID V100D-8Q) — the Quadro K4200 offers 21550% better value. The GRID V100D-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K4200 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $10000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-100% | $10000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 86.6+21550% | 0.4 |
| Codename | GK104 | GM107 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #475 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K4200 and GRID V100D-8Q
