Quadro K620M vs Quadro M500M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K620M is positioned at rank 101 and the Quadro M500M is on rank 31, so the Quadro M500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K620M

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

100%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

99%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

97%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

94%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

92%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

88%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

87%

#86

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1020%

#101

Quadro K620M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#105

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

96%

#111

Quadro P520

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

94%

#113

Radeon Pro WX 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $65

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M500M

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

90%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

85%

#16

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

378%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

79%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

78%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

78%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

78%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

77%

#31

Quadro M500M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#33

Radeon PRO W6400

MSRP: $229|Avg: $200

94%

#36

T600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $180

82%

#43

P106-100

MSRP: $224|Avg: $30

76%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K620M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro K620M	Quadro M500M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M500M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K620M Benchmark Check

Quadro M500M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K620M and Quadro M500M

Quadro K620M

The Quadro K620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,159 points.

Quadro M500M

The Quadro M500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 27 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K620M scores 1,159 and the Quadro M500M reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro M500M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620M) vs 384 (Quadro M500M). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620M) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro M500M). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K620M	Quadro M500M
G3D Mark Score	1,159	1,172+1%
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS	0.8632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1124 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	16	16
L1 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K620M	Quadro M500M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K620M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M500M has 2 GB. The Quadro K620M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Quadro K620M	Quadro M500M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K620M draws 30W versus the Quadro M500M's 30W — a 0% difference. The Quadro M500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620M) vs 350W (Quadro M500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.