Quadro K620M vs Quadro M500M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K620M vs Quadro M500M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K620M vs Quadro M500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K620M

2015

Why buy it

✅0.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro M500M

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K620M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K620M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M500M instead at 1,172 vs 1,159, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K620M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro M500M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M500M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K620M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K620M vs Quadro M500M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K620M

The Quadro K620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,159 points.

Quadro M500M

The Quadro M500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 27 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K620M scores 1,159 and the Quadro M500M reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro M500M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620M) vs 384 (Quadro M500M). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620M) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro M500M). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K620M	Quadro M500M
G3D Mark Score	1,159	1,172+1%
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS	0.8632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1124 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	16	16
L1 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K620M	Quadro M500M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K620M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M500M carries 2 GB. Quadro K620M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K620M and 64-bit on the Quadro M500M.

Feature	Quadro K620M	Quadro M500M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K620M draws 30W versus the Quadro M500M's 30W — a 0% difference. The Quadro M500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620M) vs 350W (Quadro M500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.