Quadro K620M vs Radeon HD 5750
Quadro K620M
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 5750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K620M is positioned at rank 101 and the Radeon HD 5750 is on rank 143, so the Quadro K620M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K620M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 5750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro K620M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The Quadro K620M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 5750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 5750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K620M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K620M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 5750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K620M and Radeon HD 5750
Quadro K620M
The Quadro K620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,159 points.
Radeon HD 5750
The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K620M scores 1,159 and the Radeon HD 5750 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 5750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620M) vs 720 (Radeon HD 5750). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620M) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750).
| Feature | Quadro K620M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,159 | 1,169 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 720+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 1.008 TFLOPS+17% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 36+125% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+78% | 72 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K620M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K620M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5750 has 1 GB. The Quadro K620M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro K620M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 5750) — the Quadro K620M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K620M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K620M draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 5750's 86W — a 96.6% difference. The Quadro K620M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620M) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro K620M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-65% | 86W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 38.6+184% | 13.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K620M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | Quadro K620M | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $130 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $25 |
| Codename | GM108 | Juniper |
| Release | March 1 2015 | October 13 2009 |
| Ranking | #842 | #834 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K620M and Radeon HD 5750
