Quadro K620M vs Radeon R9 M265X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K620M vs Radeon R9 M265X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K620M vs Radeon R9 M265X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K620M

2015

Why buy it

✅21.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M265X

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K620M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K620M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M265X instead at 1,167 vs 1,159, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K620M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M265X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M265X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K620M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K620M vs Radeon R9 M265X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K620M

The Quadro K620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,159 points.

Radeon R9 M265X

The Radeon R9 M265X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K620M scores 1,159 and the Radeon R9 M265X reaches 1,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 M265X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620M) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M265X). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620M) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M265X). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 625 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K620M	Radeon R9 M265X
G3D Mark Score	1,159	1,167
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS+8%	0.8 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1124 MHz+80%	625 MHz
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	16	40+150%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K620M	Radeon R9 M265X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K620M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M265X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro K620M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M265X) — the Quadro K620M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K620M	Radeon R9 M265X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K620M draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M265X's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro K620M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M265X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro K620M	Radeon R9 M265X
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	38.6+147%	15.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K620M (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro K620M	Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP	—	$200
Codename	GM108	Venus
Release	March 1 2015	March 21 2014
Ranking	#842	#839

Search Quadro K620M on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M265X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.