Quadro K620M vs Radeon HD 4850 X2

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K620M is positioned at rank 101 and the Radeon HD 4850 X2 is on rank 291, so the Quadro K620M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K620M

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

100%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

99%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

97%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

94%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

92%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

88%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

87%

#86

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1020%

#101

Quadro K620M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#105

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

96%

#111

Quadro P520

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

94%

#113

Radeon Pro WX 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $65

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4850 X2

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

2554%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2454%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

2425%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

2421%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

2416%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

2402%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

2372%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2363%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2342%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

2335%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

2307%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2302%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

2261%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

2259%

#276

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

2817%

#291

Radeon HD 4850 X2

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

100%

#292

Radeon HD 4330

MSRP: $50|Avg: $9

95%

#293

GeForce GTX 260

MSRP: $449|Avg: $449

94%

#294

Radeon HD 8490

MSRP: $99|Avg: $35

94%

#295

Radeon HD 8650D

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

93%

#297

Radeon HDG 4670

MSRP: $67|Avg: $15

89%

#298

Radeon HD 3870

MSRP: $219|Avg: $15

89%

#299

Radeon HD 4250

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

87%

#300

Radeon HD 6310

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

86%

#301

GeForce GTX 295

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

85%

#302

Radeon HD 4870 X2

MSRP: $550|Avg: $550

84%

#303

Radeon HD 3850 X2

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

83%

#305

Radeon HD 4290

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

83%

#306

Radeon HD 5450

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

80%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro K620M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The Quadro K620M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4850 X2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K620M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4850 X2.

Insight	Quadro K620M	Radeon HD 4850 X2
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K620M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K620M Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 4850 X2 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K620M and Radeon HD 4850 X2

Quadro K620M

The Quadro K620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,159 points.

Radeon HD 4850 X2

The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 7 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,132 points. Launch price was $420.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K620M scores 1,159 and the Radeon HD 4850 X2 reaches 1,132 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620M) vs 1 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 4850 X2).

Feature	Quadro K620M	Radeon HD 4850 X2
G3D Mark Score	1,159+2%	1,132
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384	800 ×2+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS	1 TFLOPS ×2+16%
ROPs	8	16 ×2+100%
TMUs	16	40 ×2+150%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K620M	Radeon HD 4850 X2
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K620M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 1 GB. The Quadro K620M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro K620M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4850 X2) — the Quadro K620M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K620M	Radeon HD 4850 X2
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K620M draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 4850 X2's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The Quadro K620M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620M) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin.

Feature	Quadro K620M	Radeon HD 4850 X2
TDP	30W-88%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length	—	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	95
Perf/Watt	38.6+758%	4.5