Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+5.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $149), it costs 66% less, resulting in a 181.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+181.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($50)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($149)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M2000 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

Quadro M2000

The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro M2000 scores 4,026 versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 4,260 — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 leads by 5.8%. The Quadro M2000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Quadro M2000) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Boost clocks: 1163 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
G3D Mark Score	4,026	4,260+6%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	1280+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.786 TFLOPS	2.496 TFLOPS+40%
Boost Clock	1163 MHz+19%	975 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	80+67%
L1 Cache	288 KB	384 KB+33%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M2000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 has 2 GB. The Quadro M2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2000) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Quadro M2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M2000) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
DirectX	12_1	12 (11_1)
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs UVD 4.0.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	VCE 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC 2nd Gen	UVD 4.0
Codecs	—	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2000 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 37.8% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 220mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
TDP	75W-32%	110W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	167mm	220mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	—	70
Perf/Watt	53.7+39%	38.7

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M2000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149 and now averages $149. The Quadro M2000 costs 66.4% less ($99 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.5 (Quadro M2000) vs 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Quadro M2000 offers 181.5% better value. The Quadro M2000 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).