Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

CPU

GPU

Quadro M2000

2016Core: 796 MHzBoost: 1163 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Performance Spectrum

Quadro M2000

4 GB 75

4,026

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX TITAN X

TITAN V CEO Edition

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2 GB 110

4,260

+5.8%

Radeon RX 550X

Radeon HD 6970

Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M2000

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 220mm, a 53mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 28.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015

Why buy it

✅19.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.
❌31.7% longer card at 220mm vs 167mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5.8% in PassMark G3D (4,260 vs 4,026), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro M2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro M2000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M2000

The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro M2000 scores 4,026 versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 4,260 — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 leads by 5.8%. The Quadro M2000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Quadro M2000) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Boost clocks: 1163 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
G3D Mark Score	4,026	4,260+6%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	1280+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.786 TFLOPS	2.496 TFLOPS+40%
Boost Clock	1163 MHz+19%	975 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	80+67%
L1 Cache	288 KB	384 KB+33%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M2000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 carries 2 GB. Quadro M2000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M2000 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2000) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Quadro M2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M2000) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
DirectX	12_1	12 (11_1)
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs UVD 4.0.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	VCE 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC 2nd Gen	UVD 4.0
Codecs	—	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2000 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 37.8% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 220mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
TDP	75W-32%	110W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	167mm	220mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	—	70
Perf/Watt	53.7+39%	38.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M2000 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Quadro M2000 was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro M2000) vs 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Quadro M2000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M2000 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
MSRP	$0-100%	$149
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	28.6
Codename	GM206	Trinidad
Release	April 8 2016	May 5 2015
Ranking	#491	#456

Search Quadro M2000 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.