Quadro K5000 vs Quadro M2000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5000 vs Quadro M2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5000 vs Quadro M2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5000

2012

Why buy it

✅12.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌62.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 75W.
❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.

Quadro M2000

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 122W, a 47W reduction.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K5000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M2000 instead at 4,026 vs 3,989, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K5000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K5000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K5000 vs Quadro M2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5000

The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Quadro M2000

The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5000 scores 3,989 and the Quadro M2000 reaches 4,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000 is built on Kepler while the Quadro M2000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5000) vs 768 (Quadro M2000). Raw compute: 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000) vs 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000). Boost clocks: 706 MHz vs 1163 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
G3D Mark Score	3,989	4,026
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+100%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.169 TFLOPS+21%	1.786 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	706 MHz	1163 MHz+65%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	128 KB	288 KB+125%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5000 and 64-bit on the Quadro M2000. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2000) — the Quadro M2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Quadro K5000) vs 12_1 (Quadro M2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
DirectX	12_0	12_1
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K5000) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	NVENC 2nd Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	NVDEC 2nd Gen

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5000 draws 122W versus the Quadro M2000's 75W — a 47.7% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000) vs 350W (Quadro M2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
TDP	122W	75W-39%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	167mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Perf/Watt	32.7	53.7+64%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K5000 came in at $2499, while the Quadro M2000 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro M2000 was 100+% cheaper ($2499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro K5000) vs Infinity (Quadro M2000) — the Quadro M2000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M2000 (2016 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
MSRP	$2499	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	1.6	Infinity
Codename	GK104	GM206
Release	August 17 2012	April 8 2016
Ranking	#492	#491

Search Quadro K5000 on Amazon

Search Quadro M2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.