Quadro K5000 vs Quadro M2000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K5000 is positioned at rank #313 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5000

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

98%

#298

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

9233%

#313

Quadro K5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60

100%

#314

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

99%

#316

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

98%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

96%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

96%

#319

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

95%

#320

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

95%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

94%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

93%

#323

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

89%

#324

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

89%

#325

Tesla K20c

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500

87%

#326

GRID M6-1Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

86%

#327

Tesla C2050 / C2070

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30

86%

#328

Quadro FX 380

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K5000.

Insight	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $60), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 21.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+21.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)	✅More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K5000 Benchmark Check

Quadro M2000 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K5000 and Quadro M2000

Quadro K5000

The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Quadro M2000

The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5000 scores 3,989 and the Quadro M2000 reaches 4,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000 is built on Kepler while the Quadro M2000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5000) vs 768 (Quadro M2000). Raw compute: 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000) vs 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000). Boost clocks: 706 MHz vs 1163 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
G3D Mark Score	3,989	4,026
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+100%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.169 TFLOPS+21%	1.786 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	706 MHz	1163 MHz+65%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	128 KB	288 KB+125%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2000) — the Quadro M2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Quadro K5000) vs 12_1 (Quadro M2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
DirectX	12_0	12_1
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K5000) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	NVENC 2nd Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	NVDEC 2nd Gen

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5000 draws 122W versus the Quadro M2000's 75W — a 47.7% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000) vs 350W (Quadro M2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Quadro M2000
TDP	122W	75W-39%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	167mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Perf/Watt	32.7	53.7+64%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K5000 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Quadro M2000 launched at $0 and now averages $50. The Quadro M2000 costs 16.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.5 (Quadro K5000) vs 80.5 (Quadro M2000) — the Quadro M2000 offers 21.1% better value. The Quadro M2000 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).