Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

CPU

GPU

Quadro K5000

2012Core: 706 MHzBoost: 706 MHz

Similar parts

··

Buy on Amazon

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

2016Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1180 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX 460 (móvel) Performance Spectrum

Quadro K5000

4 GB 122

3,989

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX TITAN X

TITAN V CEO Edition

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

2 GB 55

4,100

+2.8%

Radeon HD 6970M

Radeon RX 550

Radeon R7 260X

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

Radeon R9 290X / 390X

Radeon RX 5700M

Radeon RX 6650M XT

Radeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX 460 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX 460 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5000

2012

Why buy it

✅7.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2424.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 41.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌121.8% higher power demand at 122W vs 55W.

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,400 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2494.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 55W instead of 122W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K5000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 460 (móvel) instead at 4,100 vs 3,989, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K5000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 460 (móvel) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,400 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2494.5% (41.4 vs 1.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K5000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX 460 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5000

The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,100 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5000 scores 3,989 and the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) reaches 4,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5000) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000) vs 2.115 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 706 MHz vs 1180 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	3,989	4,100+3%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536+71%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.169 TFLOPS+3%	2.115 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	706 MHz	1180 MHz+67%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+129%	56
L1 Cache	128 KB	224 KB+75%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) carries 2 GB. Quadro K5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5000 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 460 (móvel). L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Quadro K5000) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
DirectX	12_0	12 (12_0)
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K5000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 6.3.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	VCE 3.4
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	UVD 6.3
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5000 draws 122W versus the Radeon RX 460 (móvel)'s 55W — a 75.7% difference. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
TDP	122W	55W-55%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	32.7	74.5+128%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K5000 came in at $2499, while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon RX 460 (móvel) was 96% cheaper ($2400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro K5000) vs 41.4 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) offers 2487.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 460 (móvel) (2016 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro K5000	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
MSRP	$2499	$99-96%
Performance per Dollar	1.6	41.4+2487%
Codename	GK104	Baffin
Release	August 17 2012	August 8 2016
Ranking	#492	#499

Search Quadro K5000 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 460 (móvel) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.