
Quadro K5000 vs Radeon HD 7800-serie

Quadro K5000
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7800-serie
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K5000 is positioned at rank #313 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7800-serie is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K5000 | Radeon HD 7800-serie |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7800-serie offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7800-serie holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $60), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K5000 | Radeon HD 7800-serie |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K5000 and Radeon HD 7800-serie

Quadro K5000
The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon HD 7800-serie
The Radeon HD 7800-serie is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,029 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K5000 scores 3,989 and the Radeon HD 7800-serie reaches 4,029 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7800-serie uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5000) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 7800-serie). Raw compute: 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7800-serie).
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon HD 7800-serie |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,989 | 4,029+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+20% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.169 TFLOPS | 2.56 TFLOPS+18% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 320 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon HD 7800-serie |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K5000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7800-serie has 2 GB. The Quadro K5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon HD 7800-serie |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K5000 draws 122W versus the Radeon HD 7800-serie's 200W — a 48.4% difference. The Quadro K5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000) vs 500W (Radeon HD 7800-serie). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon HD 7800-serie |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W-39% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7+63% | 20.1 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K5000 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon HD 7800-serie launched at $349 and now averages $60. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.5 (Quadro K5000) vs 67.2 (Radeon HD 7800-serie) — the Radeon HD 7800-serie offers 1.1% better value.
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon HD 7800-serie |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $349-86% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.5 | 67.2+1% |
| Codename | GK104 | Pitcairn |
| Release | August 17 2012 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #492 | #460 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















