
GRID V100D-8Q
Popular choices:

Quadro K5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID V100D-8Q
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌300.2% HIGHER MSRP$10,000 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ❌84.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 122W.
Quadro K5000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,501 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 284.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 122W instead of 225W, a 103W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GRID V100D-8Q
2016Quadro K5000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,501 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 284.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 122W instead of 225W, a 103W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌300.2% HIGHER MSRP$10,000 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ❌84.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 122W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID V100D-8Q better than Quadro K5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro K5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 45 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 24 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID V100D-8Q and Quadro K5000

GRID V100D-8Q
GRID V100D-8Q
The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.

Quadro K5000
Quadro K5000
The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The GRID V100D-8Q scores 4,156 and the Quadro K5000 reaches 3,989 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID V100D-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K5000 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5000). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 706 MHz.
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,156+4% | 3,989 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1536+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS | 2.169 TFLOPS+30% |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz+85% | 706 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+150% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID V100D-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5000 has 4 GB. The Quadro K5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000) — the GRID V100D-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID V100D-8Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K5000's 122W — a 59.4% difference. The Quadro K5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 350W (Quadro K5000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 122W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 18.5 | 32.7+77% |
Value Analysis
The GRID V100D-8Q launched at $10000 MSRP, while the Quadro K5000 launched at $2499. The Quadro K5000 costs 75% less ($7501 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 1.6 (Quadro K5000) — the Quadro K5000 offers 300% better value. The GRID V100D-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10000 | $2499-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | 1.6+300% |
| Codename | GM107 | GK104 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | August 17 2012 |
| Ranking | #622 | #492 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












