GRID V100D-8Q vs Quadro K5000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID V100D-8Q vs Quadro K5000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID V100D-8Q vs Quadro K5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID V100D-8Q

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
300.2% HIGHER MSRP
$10,000 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
❌84.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 122W.

Quadro K5000

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,501 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 284.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 122W instead of 225W, a 103W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID V100D-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.2% in PassMark G3D (4,156 vs 3,989), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID V100D-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K5000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $7,501 cheaper on MSRP at $2,499 vs $10,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 284.1% (1.6 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K5000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID V100D-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID V100D-8Q vs Quadro K5000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID V100D-8Q

The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.

Quadro K5000

The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID V100D-8Q scores 4,156 and the Quadro K5000 reaches 3,989 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID V100D-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K5000 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5000). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 706 MHz.

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Quadro K5000
G3D Mark Score	4,156+4%	3,989
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	1536+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS	2.169 TFLOPS+30%
Boost Clock	1306 MHz+85%	706 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	128+220%
L1 Cache	320 KB+150%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Quadro K5000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID V100D-8Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5000 carries 4 GB. Quadro K5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID V100D-8Q and 64-bit on the Quadro K5000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000) — the GRID V100D-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Quadro K5000
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID V100D-8Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K5000's 122W — a 59.4% difference. The Quadro K5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 350W (Quadro K5000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Quadro K5000
TDP	225W	122W-46%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	18.5	32.7+77%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID V100D-8Q came in at $10000, while the Quadro K5000 launched at $2499. On MSRP, Quadro K5000 was 75% cheaper ($7501 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 1.6 (Quadro K5000) — the Quadro K5000 offers 300% better value. The newer card here is GRID V100D-8Q (2016 vs 2012).

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Quadro K5000
MSRP	$10000	$2499-75%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	1.6+300%
Codename	GM107	GK104
Release	May 18 2016	August 17 2012
Ranking	#622	#492

Search GRID V100D-8Q on Amazon

Search Quadro K5000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.