GRID V100D-8Q vs Quadro K5000

GRID V100D-8Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K5000

2012Core: 706 MHzBoost: 706 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GRID V100D-8Q

2016

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 300.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $10,000 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • 84.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 122W.

Quadro K5000

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $7,501 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 284.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 122W instead of 225W, a 103W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is GRID V100D-8Q better than Quadro K5000?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,156 vs 3,989 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GRID V100D-8Q is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GRID V100D-8Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GRID V100D-8Q is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GRID V100D-8Q is about 300.2% more expensive on MSRP at $10,000 MSRP versus $2,499 MSRP, and you are getting 4.2% higher G3D Mark. Quadro K5000 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Quadro K5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro K5000 is 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 3,989 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGRID V100D-8QQuadro K5000
1080p
low30 FPS78 FPS
medium17 FPS67 FPS
high11 FPS53 FPS
ultra5 FPS35 FPS
1440p
low14 FPS68 FPS
medium7 FPS60 FPS
high4 FPS42 FPS
ultra2 FPS27 FPS
4K
low5 FPS25 FPS
medium3 FPS23 FPS
high2 FPS15 FPS
ultra1 FPS13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGRID V100D-8QQuadro K5000
1080p
low82 FPS80 FPS
medium51 FPS57 FPS
high38 FPS44 FPS
ultra24 FPS29 FPS
1440p
low36 FPS45 FPS
medium25 FPS29 FPS
high16 FPS22 FPS
ultra12 FPS15 FPS
4K
low11 FPS17 FPS
medium9 FPS11 FPS
high7 FPS9 FPS
ultra5 FPS7 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGRID V100D-8QQuadro K5000
1080p
low187 FPS180 FPS
medium150 FPS144 FPS
high125 FPS120 FPS
ultra94 FPS90 FPS
1440p
low140 FPS135 FPS
medium112 FPS108 FPS
high94 FPS90 FPS
ultra70 FPS67 FPS
4K
low94 FPS90 FPS
medium75 FPS72 FPS
high62 FPS60 FPS
ultra47 FPS45 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGRID V100D-8QQuadro K5000
1080p
low177 FPS131 FPS
medium143 FPS103 FPS
high125 FPS88 FPS
ultra94 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low124 FPS99 FPS
medium104 FPS79 FPS
high92 FPS68 FPS
ultra70 FPS51 FPS
4K
low72 FPS58 FPS
medium57 FPS44 FPS
high46 FPS35 FPS
ultra36 FPS24 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID V100D-8Q and Quadro K5000

NVIDIA

GRID V100D-8Q

The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K5000

The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Graphics Performance

The GRID V100D-8Q scores 4,156 and the Quadro K5000 reaches 3,989 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID V100D-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K5000 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5000). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 706 MHz.

FeatureGRID V100D-8QQuadro K5000
G3D Mark Score
4,156+4%
3,989
Architecture
Maxwell
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
1536+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.672 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS+30%
Boost Clock
1306 MHz+85%
706 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
128+220%
L1 Cache
320 KB+150%
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID V100D-8QQuadro K5000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID V100D-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5000 has 4 GB. The Quadro K5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000) — the GRID V100D-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID V100D-8QQuadro K5000
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID V100D-8Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K5000's 122W — a 59.4% difference. The Quadro K5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 350W (Quadro K5000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID V100D-8QQuadro K5000
TDP
225W
122W-46%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
18.5
32.7+77%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID V100D-8Q launched at $10000 MSRP, while the Quadro K5000 launched at $2499. The Quadro K5000 costs 75% less ($7501 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 1.6 (Quadro K5000) — the Quadro K5000 offers 300% better value. The GRID V100D-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureGRID V100D-8QQuadro K5000
MSRP
$10000
$2499-75%
Performance per Dollar
0.4
1.6+300%
Codename
GM107
GK104
Release
May 18 2016
August 17 2012
Ranking
#622
#492