CPU
GPU
Quadro K5000
Popular choices:
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K5000 is positioned at rank #313 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K5000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K5000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K5000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $450 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U, it costs 87% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 608.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K5000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+608.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K5000 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Quadro K5000
The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,225 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro K5000 scores 3,989 versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U's 4,225 — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U leads by 5.9%. The Quadro K5000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5000) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Raw compute: 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Boost clocks: 706 MHz vs 2105 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,989 | 4,225+6% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 3840+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.169 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+646% |
| Boost Clock | 706 MHz | 2105 MHz+198% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K5000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has 2 GB. The Quadro K5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K5000 draws 122W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U's 250W — a 68.8% difference. The Quadro K5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W-51% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7+93% | 16.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K5000 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U launched at $450 and now averages $450. The Quadro K5000 costs 86.7% less ($390 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.5 (Quadro K5000) vs 9.4 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Quadro K5000 offers 607.4% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $450-82% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-87% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.5+607% | 9.4 |
| Codename | GK104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | August 17 2012 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #492 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K5000 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
