
Quadro K5000

Radeon RX 460
Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX 460 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX 460 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro K5000
2012Why buy it
- ✅4.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌2171.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$110 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ❌62.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 75W.
- ❌57.1% longer card at 267mm vs 170mm.
Radeon RX 460
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,389 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2234.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 122W, a 47W reduction.
- ✅Measures 170mm instead of 267mm, a 97mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX 460 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5000
The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon RX 460
The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K5000 scores 3,989 and the Radeon RX 460 reaches 4,099 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5000) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460). Raw compute: 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460). Boost clocks: 706 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,989 | 4,099+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+71% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.169 TFLOPS | 2.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 706 MHz | 1200 MHz+70% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+129% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 224 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5000 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 460. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Quadro K5000) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 460). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K5000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K5000 draws 122W versus the Radeon RX 460's 75W — a 47.7% difference. The Radeon RX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W | 75W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | 170mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7 | 54.7+67% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro K5000 came in at $2499, while the Radeon RX 460 launched at $110. On MSRP, Radeon RX 460 was 95.6% cheaper ($2389 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro K5000) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 offers 2231.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 460 (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro K5000 | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $110-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6 | 37.3+2231% |
| Codename | GK104 | Baffin |
| Release | August 17 2012 | August 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #492 | #485 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














