CPU
GPU
Quadro M2000
Popular choices:
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro M2000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $450 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U, it costs 89% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 757.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M2000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+757.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2000 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Quadro M2000
The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,225 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M2000 scores 4,026 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U reaches 4,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro M2000) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Raw compute: 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Boost clocks: 1163 MHz vs 2105 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,026 | 4,225+5% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 3840+400% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.786 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+805% |
| Boost Clock | 1163 MHz | 2105 MHz+81% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 48 | 240+400% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 768 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M2000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has 2 GB. The Quadro M2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M2000 draws 75W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 167mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 53.7+218% | 16.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M2000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U launched at $450 and now averages $450. The Quadro M2000 costs 88.9% less ($400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.5 (Quadro M2000) vs 9.4 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Quadro M2000 offers 756.4% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $450 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-89% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.5+756% | 9.4 |
| Codename | GM206 | Navi 21 |
| Release | April 8 2016 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #491 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M2000 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
