
Quadro M2000

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
Quadro M2000 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M2000 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M2000 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M2000
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
2020Why buy it
- ✅104.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Quadro M2000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M2000 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M2000
The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,225 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M2000 scores 4,026 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U reaches 4,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro M2000) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Raw compute: 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Boost clocks: 1163 MHz vs 2105 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,026 | 4,225+5% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 3840+400% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.786 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+805% |
| Boost Clock | 1163 MHz | 2105 MHz+81% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 48 | 240+400% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 768 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M2000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U carries 2 GB. Quadro M2000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M2000 and System on the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M2000 draws 75W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 167mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 53.7+218% | 16.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M2000 came in at $0, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U launched at $450. On MSRP, Quadro M2000 was 100+% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro M2000) vs 9.4 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U) — the Quadro M2000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 9.4 |
| Codename | GM206 | Navi 21 |
| Release | April 8 2016 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #491 | #65 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














