Quadro M2000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M2000

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon RX Vega M GL is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro M2000 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega M GL across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.

Radeon RX Vega M GL

2018

Why buy it

✅23.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX Vega M GL is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M2000 instead at 4,026 vs 3,906, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro M2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX Vega M GL makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon RX Vega M GL is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro M2000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M2000

The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

Radeon RX Vega M GL

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,906 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M2000 scores 4,026 and the Radeon RX Vega M GL reaches 3,906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro M2000) vs 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 1163 MHz vs 1011 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon RX Vega M GL
G3D Mark Score	4,026+3%	3,906
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768	1280+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.786 TFLOPS	2.588 TFLOPS+45%
Boost Clock	1163 MHz+15%	1011 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	80+67%
L1 Cache	288 KB	320 KB+11%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon RX Vega M GL
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M2000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL carries 0 MB. Quadro M2000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M2000 and 1024-bit on the Radeon RX Vega M GL.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon RX Vega M GL
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	HBM2
Bus Width	64-bit	1024-bit+1500%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M2000) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon RX Vega M GL
DirectX	12_1	12 (12_1)
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs UVD 6.3.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon RX Vega M GL
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	VCE 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 2nd Gen	UVD 6.3
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2000 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GL's 65W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 167mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon RX Vega M GL
TDP	75W	65W-13%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	167mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	53.7	60.1+12%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M2000 came in at $0, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL launched at $150. On MSRP, Quadro M2000 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro M2000) vs 26.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) — the Quadro M2000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega M GL (2018 vs 2016).

Feature	Quadro M2000	Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP	$0-100%	$150
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	26.0
Codename	GM206	Polaris 22
Release	April 8 2016	February 1 2018
Ranking	#491	#500

Search Quadro M2000 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX Vega M GL on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.