
Quadro M2000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870.
| Insight | Quadro M2000 | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Vega (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $150 for the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 208% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M2000 | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+208%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Counter-Strike 2

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2000 and Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

Quadro M2000
The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2018. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,922 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M2000 scores 4,026 and the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 reaches 3,922 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 uses Vega, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro M2000) vs 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870). Boost clocks: 1163 MHz vs 1011 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,026+3% | 3,922 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Vega |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1280+67% |
| Boost Clock | 1163 MHz+15% | 1011 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M2000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 has 0 MB. The Quadro M2000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 1024-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 1024-bit+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M2000) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M2000 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870's 65W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 167mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 65W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 167mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 53.7 | 60.3+12% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M2000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Quadro M2000 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.5 (Quadro M2000) vs 26.1 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870) — the Quadro M2000 offers 208.4% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-67% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.5+208% | 26.1 |
| Codename | GM206 | Vega Kaby Lake-G |
| Release | April 8 2016 | January 7 2018 |
| Ranking | #491 | #427 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














