Quadro M3000M
VS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

Quadro M3000M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

NVIDIA

Quadro M3000M

2015Core: 1050 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

2020Core: 1350 MHzBoost: 1485 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro M3000M
75
5,574
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 860M
brand logoGeForce MX450
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 760
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
50
5,918
+6.2%
brand logoGeForce GTX 750
brand logoGeForce GTX 570
brand logoGeForce MX550
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M3000M is positioned at rank 9 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is on rank 28, so the Quadro M3000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M3000M

#1
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
186%
#9
Quadro M3000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

#18
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
156%
#20
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
141%
#21
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
141%
#25
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
128%
#26
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
127%
#28
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#35
GeForce GTX 960M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
97%
#37
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M3000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M3000M.

InsightQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
Performance
❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.2%)
✅Leading raw performance (+6.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
—
—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M3000M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low162 FPS
medium118 FPS
high97 FPS
ultra70 FPS
1440p
low101 FPS
medium69 FPS
high56 FPS
ultra39 FPS
4K
low31 FPS
medium24 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low179 FPS
medium144 FPS
high113 FPS
ultra87 FPS
1440p
low108 FPS
medium89 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra53 FPS
4K
low34 FPS
medium29 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra16 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low251 FPS
medium175 FPS
high115 FPS
ultra66 FPS
1440p
low158 FPS
medium114 FPS
high77 FPS
ultra47 FPS
4K
low83 FPS
medium58 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra26 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low167 FPS
medium139 FPS
high117 FPS
ultra81 FPS
1440p
low84 FPS
medium70 FPS
high56 FPS
ultra41 FPS
4K
low36 FPS
medium29 FPS
high23 FPS
ultra16 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low251 FPS
medium201 FPS
high167 FPS
ultra125 FPS
1440p
low188 FPS
medium150 FPS
high125 FPS
ultra94 FPS
4K
low125 FPS
medium100 FPS
high84 FPS
ultra63 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low266 FPS
medium213 FPS
high178 FPS
ultra133 FPS
1440p
low200 FPS
medium160 FPS
high133 FPS
ultra100 FPS
4K
low133 FPS
medium107 FPS
high89 FPS
ultra67 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low168 FPS
medium151 FPS
high129 FPS
ultra94 FPS
1440p
low98 FPS
medium90 FPS
high72 FPS
ultra53 FPS
4K
low51 FPS
medium44 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra19 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low210 FPS
medium185 FPS
high154 FPS
ultra133 FPS
1440p
low181 FPS
medium160 FPS
high133 FPS
ultra100 FPS
4K
low98 FPS
medium91 FPS
high66 FPS
ultra52 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M3000M and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

NVIDIA

Quadro M3000M

The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,918 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro M3000M scores 5,574 versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)'s 5,918 — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) leads by 6.2%. The Quadro M3000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M3000M) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)). Raw compute: 2.15 TFLOPS (Quadro M3000M) vs 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)).

FeatureQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
G3D Mark Score
5,574
5,918+6%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1,024
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.15 TFLOPS
3.041 TFLOPS+41%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
64
L1 Cache
0.38 MB
1 MB+163%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M3000M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) — the Quadro M3000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M3000M) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M3000M) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Quadro M3000M) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)).

FeatureQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
Encoder
3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
NVENC (6th Gen)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M3000M draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)'s 50W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M3000M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureQuadro M3000MGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
74.3
118.4+59%