Quadro M3000M vs GeForce GTX 680
Quadro M3000M
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 680
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M3000M is positioned at rank #9 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M3000M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 680 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M3000M.
| Insight | Quadro M3000M | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (256mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 680 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M3000M and GeForce GTX 680
Quadro M3000M
The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.
GeForce GTX 680
The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M3000M scores 5,574 and the GeForce GTX 680 reaches 5,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M3000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 680 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M3000M) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680). Raw compute: 2.15 TFLOPS (Quadro M3000M) vs 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680).
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,574 | 5,609 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,024 | 1536+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.15 TFLOPS | 3.25 TFLOPS+51% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+200% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M3000M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680) — the Quadro M3000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M3000M) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 680). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (FL 11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M3000M) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 680). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Quadro M3000M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680).
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M3000M draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 680's 195W — a 88.9% difference. The Quadro M3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M3000M) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 680). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 98°C.
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-62% | 195W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 256mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-23% | 98°C |
| Perf/Watt | 74.3+158% | 28.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M3000M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $40 |
| Codename | GM204 | GK104 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #411 | #410 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M3000M and GeForce GTX 680
