CPU
GPU
Quadro M4000M
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 130T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M4000M is positioned at rank 4 and the Arc Graphics 130T is on rank 239, so the Quadro M4000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000M
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 130T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Arc Graphics 130T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M4000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 130T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M4000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro M4000M | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc Graphics 130T remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M4000M and Arc Graphics 130T
Quadro M4000M
The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.
Arc Graphics 130T
The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M4000M scores 6,148 and the Arc Graphics 130T reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Arc Graphics 130T uses Xe+. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000M) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130T).
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,148 | 6,208 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Xe+ |
| Shading Units | 1,280+18186% | 7 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M4000M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130T has 0 MB. The Quadro M4000M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000M) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5 (Quadro M4000M) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T). Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX (Quadro M4000M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130T).
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5 | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M4000M draws 100W versus the Arc Graphics 130T's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000M) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130T). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 15W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 61.5 | 413.9+573% |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $250 |
| Codename | GM204 | — |
| Release | August 18 2015 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #392 | #386 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M4000M and Arc Graphics 130T
