Quadro M4000M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M4000M is positioned at rank 4 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is on rank 5, so the Quadro M4000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000M

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

144%

#4

Quadro M4000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

#5

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

100%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

90%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

90%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

82%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

81%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

80%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M4000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M4000M.

Insight	Quadro M4000M	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M4000M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q Benchmark Check

League of Legends

No prediction data available

League of Legends

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M4000M and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Quadro M4000M

The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,314 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M4000M scores 6,148 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q reaches 6,314 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000M) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 1125 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M4000M	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	6,148	6,314+3%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1,280+25%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.496 TFLOPS+8%	2.304 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1013 MHz	1125 MHz+11%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	80+25%	64
L1 Cache	0.47 MB	1 MB+113%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M4000M	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M4000M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) — the Quadro M4000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M4000M	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000M) vs 12 (11_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro M4000M	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5 (Quadro M4000M) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX (Quadro M4000M) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q).

Feature	Quadro M4000M	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Encoder	NVENC 5	NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	NVDEC 1	NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M4000M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.