
Quadro M520 vs GeForce GTX 470M

Quadro M520
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 470M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M520 is positioned at rank 145 and the GeForce GTX 470M is on rank 38, so the GeForce GTX 470M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M520
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 470M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro M520 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Quadro M520 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 470M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 470M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M520 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro M520 | GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 470M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M520 and GeForce GTX 470M

Quadro M520
The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.

GeForce GTX 470M
The GeForce GTX 470M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 535 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,953 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M520 scores 1,913 and the GeForce GTX 470M reaches 1,953 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M520 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 470M uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M520) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 470M). Raw compute: 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520) vs 0.6163 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 470M).
| Feature | Quadro M520 | GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,913 | 1,953+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+33% | 288 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7995 TFLOPS+30% | 0.6163 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 24+200% |
| TMUs | 16 | 48+200% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 384 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M520 | GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M520 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 470M has 2 GB. The Quadro M520 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M520) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 470M) — the Quadro M520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M520 | GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+33% | 1.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M520 draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 470M's 75W — a 100% difference. The Quadro M520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M520) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 470M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro M520 | GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-67% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.5+194% | 26.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M520 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro M520 | GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | — |
| Codename | GM108 | GF104 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | September 3 2010 |
| Ranking | #695 | #689 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












