Quadro M520 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M520 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M520 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M520

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro WX 4130

2017

Why buy it

✅22.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
50% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M520 instead at 1,913 vs 1,890, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro M520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro M520 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 51.8% (9.6 vs 6.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro WX 4130 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro M520 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M520

The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4130

The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,890 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M520 scores 1,913 and the Radeon Pro WX 4130 reaches 1,890 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M520 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M520) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Raw compute: 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520) vs 1.348 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Boost clocks: 1019 MHz vs 1053 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M520	Radeon Pro WX 4130
G3D Mark Score	1,913+1%	1,890
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7995 TFLOPS	1.348 TFLOPS+69%
Boost Clock	1019 MHz	1053 MHz+3%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	16	40+150%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M520	Radeon Pro WX 4130
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M520 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4130 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M520 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4130.

Feature	Quadro M520	Radeon Pro WX 4130
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M520 draws 25W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4130's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro M520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M520) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro M520	Radeon Pro WX 4130
TDP	25W-50%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	76.5+102%	37.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M520 came in at $200, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 launched at $300. On MSRP, Quadro M520 was 33.3% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.6 (Quadro M520) vs 6.3 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the Quadro M520 offers 52.4% better value.

Feature	Quadro M520	Radeon Pro WX 4130
MSRP	$200-33%	$300
Performance per Dollar	9.6+52%	6.3
Codename	GM108	Baffin
Release	January 11 2017	March 1 2017
Ranking	#695	#697

Search Quadro M520 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 4130 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.