
Quadro M520

Radeon HD 7700-serie
Quadro M520 vs Radeon HD 7700-serie Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M520 vs Radeon HD 7700-serie FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M520 vs Radeon HD 7700-serie: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M520
2017Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 250W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7700-serie across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌25.8% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 11.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7700-serie
2012Why buy it
- ✅90.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $41 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.9 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 250W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M520 vs Radeon HD 7700-serie Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M520
The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.

Radeon HD 7700-serie
The Radeon HD 7700-serie is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,899 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M520 scores 1,913 and the Radeon HD 7700-serie reaches 1,899 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M520 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 7700-serie uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M520) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Raw compute: 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Boost clocks: 1019 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M520 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,913 | 1,899 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7995 TFLOPS | 3.789 TFLOPS+374% |
| Boost Clock | 1019 MHz+10% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 128+700% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M520 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M520 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7700-serie carries 512 MB. Quadro M520 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M520 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7700-serie. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M520) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 7700-serie) — the Quadro M520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M520 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M520 draws 25W versus the Radeon HD 7700-serie's 250W — a 163.6% difference. The Quadro M520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M520) vs 450W (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro M520 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-90% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 76.5+907% | 7.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M520 came in at $200, while the Radeon HD 7700-serie launched at $159. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7700-serie was 20.5% cheaper ($41 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.6 (Quadro M520) vs 11.9 (Radeon HD 7700-serie) — the Radeon HD 7700-serie offers 24% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M520 (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro M520 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $159-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 11.9+24% |
| Codename | GM108 | Tahiti |
| Release | January 11 2017 | January 9 2012 |
| Ranking | #695 | #431 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















