Quadro M520 vs RadeonT RX Vega 11

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M520 vs RadeonT RX Vega 11 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M520 vs RadeonT RX Vega 11: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M520

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅RadeonT RX Vega 11 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro M520 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX Vega 11 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RadeonT RX Vega 11

2018

Why buy it

✅8.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RadeonT RX Vega 11 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (1,917 vs 1,913), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro M520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro M520 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. RadeonT RX Vega 11 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro M520 vs RadeonT RX Vega 11 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M520

The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.

RadeonT RX Vega 11

The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,917 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M520 scores 1,913 and the RadeonT RX Vega 11 reaches 1,917 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M520 is built on Maxwell while the RadeonT RX Vega 11 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M520) vs 704 (RadeonT RX Vega 11). Raw compute: 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX Vega 11). Boost clocks: 1019 MHz vs 1251 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M520	RadeonT RX Vega 11
G3D Mark Score	1,913	1,917
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 5.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	704+83%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7995 TFLOPS	1.761 TFLOPS+120%
Boost Clock	1019 MHz	1251 MHz+23%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	16	44+175%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M520	RadeonT RX Vega 11
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M520 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT RX Vega 11 carries 0 MB. Quadro M520 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M520 and 64-bit on the RadeonT RX Vega 11.

Feature	Quadro M520	RadeonT RX Vega 11
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M520 draws 25W versus the RadeonT RX Vega 11's 35W — a 33.3% difference. The Quadro M520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M520) vs 1W (RadeonT RX Vega 11). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	Quadro M520	RadeonT RX Vega 11
TDP	25W-29%	35W
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Perf/Watt	76.5+40%	54.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M520 came in at $200, while the RadeonT RX Vega 11 launched at $0. On MSRP, RadeonT RX Vega 11 was 100+% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.6 (Quadro M520) vs Infinity (RadeonT RX Vega 11) — the RadeonT RX Vega 11 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RadeonT RX Vega 11 (2018 vs 2017).

Feature	Quadro M520	RadeonT RX Vega 11
MSRP	$200	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	9.6	Infinity
Codename	GM108	Raven
Release	January 11 2017	May 10 2018
Ranking	#695	#673

Search Quadro M520 on Amazon

Search RadeonT RX Vega 11 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.