
Quadro M520

RadeonT Vega 8
Quadro M520 vs RadeonT Vega 8 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M520 vs RadeonT Vega 8 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M520 vs RadeonT Vega 8: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M520
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 45W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT Vega 8 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RadeonT Vega 8
2021Why buy it
- ✅6.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Quadro M520 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RadeonT Vega 8 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 45W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M520 vs RadeonT Vega 8 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M520
The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.

RadeonT Vega 8
The RadeonT Vega 8 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,894 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M520 scores 1,913 and the RadeonT Vega 8 reaches 1,894 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M520 is built on Maxwell while the RadeonT Vega 8 uses GCN 5.1, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M520) vs 448 (RadeonT Vega 8). Raw compute: 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520) vs 1.702 TFLOPS (RadeonT Vega 8). Boost clocks: 1019 MHz vs 1900 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M520 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,913+1% | 1,894 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 448+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7995 TFLOPS | 1.702 TFLOPS+113% |
| Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | 1900 MHz+86% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M520 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M520 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT Vega 8 carries 0 MB. Quadro M520 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M520 and 64-bit on the RadeonT Vega 8.
| Feature | Quadro M520 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M520 draws 25W versus the RadeonT Vega 8's 45W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro M520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M520) vs 1W (RadeonT Vega 8). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro M520 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-44% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.5+82% | 42.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M520 came in at $200, while the RadeonT Vega 8 launched at $0. On MSRP, RadeonT Vega 8 was 100+% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.6 (Quadro M520) vs Infinity (RadeonT Vega 8) — the RadeonT Vega 8 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RadeonT Vega 8 (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro M520 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM108 | Cezanne |
| Release | January 11 2017 | April 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #695 | #601 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















