
Quadro M520
Popular choices:

RadeonT Vega 8
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M520 is positioned at rank #145 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M520
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RadeonT Vega 8 uses modern memory architecture. The RadeonT Vega 8 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M520 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT Vega 8.
| Insight | Quadro M520 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M520 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M520 and RadeonT Vega 8

Quadro M520
The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.

RadeonT Vega 8
The RadeonT Vega 8 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,894 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M520 scores 1,913 and the RadeonT Vega 8 reaches 1,894 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M520 is built on Maxwell while the RadeonT Vega 8 uses GCN 5.1, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M520) vs 448 (RadeonT Vega 8). Raw compute: 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520) vs 1.702 TFLOPS (RadeonT Vega 8). Boost clocks: 1019 MHz vs 1900 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M520 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,913+1% | 1,894 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 448+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7995 TFLOPS | 1.702 TFLOPS+113% |
| Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | 1900 MHz+86% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M520 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M520 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT Vega 8 has 0 MB. The Quadro M520 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M520 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M520 draws 25W versus the RadeonT Vega 8's 45W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro M520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M520) vs 1W (RadeonT Vega 8). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro M520 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-44% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.5+82% | 42.1 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M520 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the RadeonT Vega 8 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The RadeonT Vega 8 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 38.3 (Quadro M520) vs Infinity (RadeonT Vega 8) — the RadeonT Vega 8 offers Infinity% better value. The RadeonT Vega 8 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro M520 | RadeonT Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM108 | Cezanne |
| Release | January 11 2017 | April 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #695 | #601 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















