Quadro M520 vs GeForce GTX 645

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M520 is positioned at rank #145 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M520

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

94%

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

90%

#130

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1544%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

100%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

99%

#147

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

98%

#148

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

96%

#149

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

96%

#151

FirePro M40003

MSRP: $150|Avg: $72

95%

#152

Radeon Pro 465

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

95%

#154

Tesla P4

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190

94%

#155

Radeon Pro WX 4150

MSRP: $300|Avg: $120

92%

#158

Quadro M2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $70

90%

#159

Quadro M4000

MSRP: $791|Avg: $350

88%

#160

FirePro W4100

MSRP: $183|Avg: $183

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro M520 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Quadro M520 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 645 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 645.

Insight	Quadro M520	GeForce GTX 645
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 645 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 645 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 145.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro M520	GeForce GTX 645
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+145.7%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M520 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 645 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M520 and GeForce GTX 645

Quadro M520

The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.

GeForce GTX 645

The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M520 scores 1,913 and the GeForce GTX 645 reaches 1,880 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M520 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 645 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M520) vs 352 (GeForce GTX 645). Raw compute: 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645).

Feature	Quadro M520	GeForce GTX 645
G3D Mark Score	1,913+2%	1,880
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+9%	352
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7995 TFLOPS	0.8554 TFLOPS+7%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	16	44+175%
L1 Cache	128 KB	704 KB+450%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M520	GeForce GTX 645
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M520 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 645 has 1 GB. The Quadro M520 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M520) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 645) — the Quadro M520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M520	GeForce GTX 645
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M520 draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 645's 200W — a 155.6% difference. The Quadro M520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M520) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 645). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro M520	GeForce GTX 645
TDP	25W-88%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	147mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	76.5+714%	9.4

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M520 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 and now averages $20. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 38.3 (Quadro M520) vs 94.0 (GeForce GTX 645) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 145.4% better value. The Quadro M520 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).