
Quadro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro M6000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M6000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 16.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (12 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060.
| Insight | Quadro M6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+16.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-16.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $500), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 612.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+612.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M6000 and GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro M6000
The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro M6000 scores 11,769 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the Quadro M6000 leads by 16.9%. The Quadro M6000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,769+17% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.844 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+30% |
| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 1733 MHz+56% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB+17% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M6000 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The Quadro M6000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 65.1% advantage for the Quadro M6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the Quadro M6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 317 GB/s+65% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12/1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M6000 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 180W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 173mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 47.1 | 55.9+19% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M6000 launched at $4999 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 88% less ($440 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.5 (Quadro M6000) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 613.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999 | $249-95% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $60-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.5 | 167.7+614% |
| Codename | GM200 | GP104 |
| Release | March 21 2015 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #228 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












