Quadro M6000 vs GeForce RTX 3060
Quadro M6000
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M6000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 3060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 44.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M6000.
| Insight | Quadro M6000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-44.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+44.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $289 versus $500 for the Quadro M6000, it costs 42% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 149.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M6000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+149.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($289) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M6000 and GeForce RTX 3060
Quadro M6000
The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro M6000 scores 11,769 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 44.4%. The Quadro M6000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,769 | 16,995+44% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3584+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.844 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+86% |
| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 1777 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+71% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 3.5 MB+218% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 13.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 317 GB/s | 360 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12/1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M6000 draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 38.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 170W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.1 | 100.0+112% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M6000 launched at $4999 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 and now averages $289. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 42.2% less ($211 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.5 (Quadro M6000) vs 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 150.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999 | $329-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $289-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.5 | 58.8+150% |
| Codename | GM200 | GA106 |
| Release | March 21 2015 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #228 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M6000 and GeForce RTX 3060
