Quadro M620 vs FirePro W4300

Quadro M620

2017Core: 756 MHzBoost: 977 MHz

FirePro W4300

2015Core: 930 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro M620

2,758

+1.4%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

FirePro W4300

2,719

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4300

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

99%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

98%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

97%

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

94%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

93%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

90%

#153

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2060%

#168

FirePro W4300

MSRP: $379|Avg: $50

100%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

100%

#173

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

MSRP: $119|Avg: $86

98%

#175

Radeon Pro 560

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

97%

#176

Radeon Pro 460

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

96%

#180

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

MSRP: $139|Avg: $85

92%

#181

FirePro M5950

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

92%

#183

Radeon Pro WX 7130

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W4300 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro M620	FirePro W4300
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro M620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M620 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 26.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro M620	FirePro W4300
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+26.8%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M620 Benchmark Check

FirePro W4300 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M620 and FirePro W4300

Quadro M620

The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M620 scores 2,758 and the FirePro W4300 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M620 is built on Maxwell while the FirePro W4300 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro M620) vs 768 (FirePro W4300). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620) vs 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300).

Feature	Quadro M620	FirePro W4300
G3D Mark Score	2,758+1%	2,719
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	768+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1 TFLOPS	1.428 TFLOPS+43%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M620	FirePro W4300
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M620 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W4300 has 4 GB. The FirePro W4300 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M620) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro W4300) — the Quadro M620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M620	FirePro W4300
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M620) vs 12 (FirePro W4300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.

Feature	Quadro M620	FirePro W4300
DirectX	12_1	12
Max Displays	0	6

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (Quadro M620) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	Quadro M620	FirePro W4300
Encoder	NVENC 5th Gen	VCE 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC 2nd Gen	UVD 4.2
Codecs	—	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M620 draws 30W versus the FirePro W4300's 50W — a 50% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M620) vs 350W (FirePro W4300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 171mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Quadro M620	FirePro W4300
TDP	30W-40%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	171mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	—	71°C
Perf/Watt	91.9+69%	54.4

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M620 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro W4300 launched at $379 and now averages $50. The Quadro M620 costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.0 (Quadro M620) vs 54.4 (FirePro W4300) — the Quadro M620 offers 26.8% better value. The Quadro M620 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).