CPU
GPU
Quadro M620
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M620 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 501.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M620.
| Insight | Quadro M620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-501.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+501.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $250 for the Radeon RX 7600, it costs 84% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M620 and Radeon RX 7600
Quadro M620
The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro M620 scores 2,758 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 501.2%. The Quadro M620 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro M620) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 977 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,758 | 16,581+501% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+2075% |
| Boost Clock | 977 MHz | 2655 MHz+172% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M620 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M620 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M620) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (Quadro M620) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs VCN 4.0.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M620 draws 30W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 138.5% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M620) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-82% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.9 | 100.5+9% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M620 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The Quadro M620 costs 84% less ($210 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.0 (Quadro M620) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Quadro M620 offers 4.1% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $269 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-84% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.0+4% | 66.3 |
| Codename | GM107 | Navi 33 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #606 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M620 and Radeon RX 7600
