Quadro M620 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Quadro M620
Popular choices:
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs uses modern memory architecture. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M620 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.
| Insight | Quadro M620 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M620 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M620 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Quadro M620
The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M620 scores 2,758 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs reaches 2,715 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M620 is built on Maxwell while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro M620) vs 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Boost clocks: 977 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,758+2% | 2,715 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+540% | 80 |
| Boost Clock | 977 MHz | 1350 MHz+38% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M620 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has 0 MB. The Quadro M620 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M620) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (Quadro M620) vs Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs Quick Sync Video (Gen 12).
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th Gen | Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M620 draws 30W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs's 28W — a 6.9% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M620) vs 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 28W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 91.9 | 97.0+6% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M620 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.0 (Quadro M620) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | January 11 2017 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #606 | #584 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M620 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
