Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

80

5,353

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU

Titan X Pascal

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (móvel)

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

15

5,500

+2.7%

Iris Plus Graphics 950

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is positioned at rank #16 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 Max-Q

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

221%

#16

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

66%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

59%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P2000 Max-Q.

Insight	Quadro P2000 Max-Q	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	Xe LPG (2023) (5nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q Benchmark Check

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 Max-Q and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q scores 5,353 and the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) uses Xe LPG, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1950 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P2000 Max-Q	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
G3D Mark Score	5,353	5,500+3%
Architecture	Pascal	Xe LPG
Process Node	14 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	768+19100%	4
Boost Clock	1468 MHz	1950 MHz+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P2000 Max-Q	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	XeSS
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	Quadro P2000 Max-Q	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q draws 80W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)'s 15W — a 136.8% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.