Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs Arc A310
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Arc A310
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is positioned at rank #16 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Performance Per Dollar Arc A310
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A310 uses modern memory architecture. The Arc A310 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A310 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P2000 Max-Q.
| Insight | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A310 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 Max-Q and Arc A310
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q scores 5,353 and the Arc A310 reaches 5,438 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Arc A310 uses Generation 12.7, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q) vs 768 (Arc A310). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,353 | 5,438+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 2000 MHz+36% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q draws 80W versus the Arc A310's 75W — a 6.5% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q) vs 300W (Arc A310). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 75W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 169mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 66.9 | 72.5+8% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A310 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | GP107GL | DG2-128 |
| Release | July 5 2017 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #426 | #422 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P2000 Max-Q and Arc A310
