Quadro P2000 Max-Q
VS
Radeon RX 6300

Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6300

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

2017Core: 1215 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6300

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is positioned at rank 16 and the Radeon RX 6300 is on rank 14, so the Radeon RX 6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 Max-Q

#1
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
221%
#16
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#26
RTX A400
MSRP: $135|Avg: $135
66%
#29
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
59%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300

#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
122%
#8
111%
#9
111%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
101%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
100%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 6300 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 6300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300.

InsightQuadro P2000 Max-QRadeon RX 6300
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P2000 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 Max-Q and Radeon RX 6300

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q scores 5,353 and the Radeon RX 6300 reaches 5,319 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P2000 Max-QRadeon RX 6300
G3D Mark Score
5,353
5,319
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
768
768
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
2400 MHz+63%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureQuadro P2000 Max-QRadeon RX 6300
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 3 (Native)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 32-bit.

FeatureQuadro P2000 Max-QRadeon RX 6300
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit+300%
32-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q draws 80W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 78.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro P2000 Max-QRadeon RX 6300
TDP
80W
35W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
66.9
152.0+127%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).

FeatureQuadro P2000 Max-QRadeon RX 6300
MSRP
$60
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Codename
GP107GL
Navi 24
Release
July 5 2017
January 4 2022
Ranking
#426
#379