Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6300

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

2017Core: 1215 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6300

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
RX family
·······

Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 88.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • 128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300

2022

Why buy it

  • 5.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 6300 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P2000 Max-Q instead at 5,353 vs 5,319, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Quadro P2000 Max-Q is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q scores 5,353 and the Radeon RX 6300 reaches 5,319 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P2000 Max-QRadeon RX 6300
G3D Mark Score
5,353
5,319
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
768
768
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
2400 MHz+63%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureQuadro P2000 Max-QRadeon RX 6300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Quadro P2000 Max-Q and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300.

FeatureQuadro P2000 Max-QRadeon RX 6300
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit+300%
32-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q draws 80W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 78.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro P2000 Max-QRadeon RX 6300
TDP
80W
35W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
66.9
152.0+127%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300 (2022 vs 2017).

FeatureQuadro P2000 Max-QRadeon RX 6300
MSRP
$60
Codename
GP107GL
Navi 24
Release
July 5 2017
January 4 2022
Ranking
#426
#379

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.