
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:

Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
2023Why buy it
- β More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.
- β More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βFewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
2023Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- β More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.
- β More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βFewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) better than Quadro P2000 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P2000 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and Quadro P2000 Max-Q

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Graphics Performance
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the Quadro P2000 Max-Q reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500+3% | 5,353 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 768+19100% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz+33% | 1468 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the Quadro P2000 Max-Q's 80W β a 136.8% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-81% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+448% | 66.9 |
Value Analysis
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | β |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | GP107GL |
| Release | December 14 2023 | July 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #495 | #426 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













