
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Popular choices:

Quadro T1200 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro T1200 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌344.4% higher power demand at 80W vs 18W.
Quadro T1200 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅22.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P2000 Max-Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P2000 Max-Q is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 80W, a 62W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2017Quadro T1200 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅22.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P2000 Max-Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P2000 Max-Q is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 80W, a 62W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro T1200 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌344.4% higher power demand at 80W vs 18W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro T1200 Mobile better than Quadro P2000 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P2000 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 Max-Q and Quadro T1200 Mobile

Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q scores 5,353 and the Quadro T1200 Mobile reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Quadro T1200 Mobile uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q) vs 1,024 (Quadro T1200 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,353 | 5,500+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1024+33% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+3% | 1425 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q draws 80W versus the Quadro T1200 Mobile's 18W — a 126.5% difference. The Quadro T1200 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q) vs 350W (Quadro T1200 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 18W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 66.9 | 305.6+357% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













