Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is positioned at rank #16 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X.
| Insight | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (275mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P2000 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 Max-Q and Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,248 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q scores 5,353 and the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X reaches 5,248 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,353+2% | 5,248 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+47% | 1000 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X has 3 GB. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q draws 80W versus the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X's 200W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q) vs 500W (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-60% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 275mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 C |
| Perf/Watt | 66.9+155% | 26.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $40 |
| Codename | GP107GL | Tahiti |
| Release | July 5 2017 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #426 | #404 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P2000 Max-Q and Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
