Quadro P3200 vs Radeon RX590 GME

CPU

GPU

Quadro P3200

2018Core: 1328 MHzBoost: 1543 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon RX590 GME

2018Core: 1469 MHzBoost: 1545 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Quadro P3200 vs Radeon RX590 GME Performance Spectrum

Quadro P3200

4 GB 75

8,578

+2.7%

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce MX570

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

TITAN V

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Radeon RX590 GME

8 GB 175

8,349

0.0%

Radeon R9 Nano

Radeon HD 7990

Radeon RX 6300M

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P3200 vs Radeon RX590 GME FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P3200 vs Radeon RX590 GME: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P3200

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 175W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX590 GME across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
189% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$173 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).

Radeon RX590 GME

2018

Why buy it

✅20.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $327 less on MSRP ($173 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 181.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($173 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌133.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX590 GME is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P3200 instead at 8,578 vs 8,349, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P3200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX590 GME makes the most sense to buy today. It is $327 cheaper on MSRP at $173 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 181.3% (48.3 vs 17.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX590 GME is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro P3200 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P3200 vs Radeon RX590 GME Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P3200

The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.

Radeon RX590 GME

The Radeon RX590 GME is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,349 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3200 scores 8,578 and the Radeon RX590 GME reaches 8,349 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX590 GME uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX590 GME). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX590 GME). Boost clocks: 1543 MHz vs 1545 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3200	Radeon RX590 GME
G3D Mark Score	8,578+3%	8,349
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1792	2304+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.53 TFLOPS	7.119 TFLOPS+29%
Boost Clock	1543 MHz	1545 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	112	144+29%
L1 Cache	672 KB+17%	576 KB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P3200	Radeon RX590 GME
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX590 GME carries 8 GB. Radeon RX590 GME gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P3200 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX590 GME. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX590 GME) — the Radeon RX590 GME has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3200	Radeon RX590 GME
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P3200) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX590 GME). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P3200	Radeon RX590 GME
DirectX	12	12.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX590 GME). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX590 GME).

Feature	Quadro P3200	Radeon RX590 GME
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	VCE 3.4
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.265,H.264	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3200 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX590 GME's 175W — a 80% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P3200) vs 500W (Radeon RX590 GME). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro P3200	Radeon RX590 GME
TDP	75W-57%	175W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	0mm	241mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80	80°C
Perf/Watt	114.4+140%	47.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P3200 came in at $500, while the Radeon RX590 GME launched at $173. On MSRP, Radeon RX590 GME was 65.4% cheaper ($327 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.2 (Quadro P3200) vs 48.3 (Radeon RX590 GME) — the Radeon RX590 GME offers 180.8% better value.

Feature	Quadro P3200	Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP	$500	$173-65%
Performance per Dollar	17.2	48.3+181%
Codename	GP104	Polaris 30
Release	February 21 2018	November 15 2018
Ranking	#304	#285

Search Quadro P3200 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX590 GME on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.