CPU
GPU
Quadro P3200
Popular choices:
Radeon RX590 GME
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P3200 is positioned at rank #86 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX590 GME
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX590 GME offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $63 versus $115 for the Radeon RX590 GME, it costs 45% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 87.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+87.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($63) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($115) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3200 and Radeon RX590 GME
Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.
Radeon RX590 GME
The Radeon RX590 GME is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,349 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3200 scores 8,578 and the Radeon RX590 GME reaches 8,349 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX590 GME uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX590 GME). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX590 GME). Boost clocks: 1543 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,578+3% | 8,349 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2304+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 1543 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 144+29% |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB+17% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX590 GME has 8 GB. The Radeon RX590 GME offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX590 GME) — the Radeon RX590 GME has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P3200) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX590 GME). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX590 GME). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX590 GME).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3200 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX590 GME's 175W — a 80% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P3200) vs 500W (Radeon RX590 GME). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-57% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 114.4+140% | 47.7 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $63, while the Radeon RX590 GME launched at $173 and now averages $115. The Quadro P3200 costs 45.2% less ($52 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 136.2 (Quadro P3200) vs 72.6 (Radeon RX590 GME) — the Quadro P3200 offers 87.6% better value.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $173-65% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $63-45% | $115 |
| Performance per Dollar | 136.2+88% | 72.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | Polaris 30 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | November 15 2018 |
| Ranking | #304 | #285 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P3200 and Radeon RX590 GME
