Quadro P400 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750
Quadro P400
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics P750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P400 is positioned at rank #143 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P400
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P400 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P400 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $100 for the Intel UHD Graphics P750, it costs 40% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 65.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P400 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+65.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P400 and Intel UHD Graphics P750
Quadro P400
The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.
Intel UHD Graphics P750
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P400 scores 1,659 and the Intel UHD Graphics P750 reaches 1,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P400 is built on Pascal while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses Generation 12.1, both on 14 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 256 (Quadro P400) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400) vs 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Boost clocks: 1252 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,659 | 1,669 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 256 | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.641 TFLOPS | 0.6656 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 1252 MHz | 1300 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 64+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P400 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 has 0 MB. The Quadro P400 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P400) vs 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P400) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs QuickSync.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | QuickSync |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P400 draws 30W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P750's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P400) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 15W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 145mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 55.3 | 111.3+101% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P400 launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 launched at $150 and now averages $100. The Quadro P400 costs 40% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.6 (Quadro P400) vs 16.7 (Intel UHD Graphics P750) — the Quadro P400 offers 65.3% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P400 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $150-11% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-40% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.6+65% | 16.7 |
| Codename | GP107 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Release | February 7 2017 | 2021 |
| Ranking | #741 | #717 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P400 and Intel UHD Graphics P750
