Quadro P400
VS
FirePro W600

Quadro P400 vs FirePro W600

NVIDIA

Quadro P400

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1252 MHz
VS

FirePro W600

2012Core: 750 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P400 is positioned at rank 143 and the FirePro W600 is on rank 253, so the Quadro P400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P400

#70
Radeon PRO W6800
MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249
92%
#72
Quadro P4200
MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110
88%
#128
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1504%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
100%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
98%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
97%
#146
Radeon Sky 500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#147
Quadro M5000
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
96%
#148
Radeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $85
94%
#149
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $819|Avg: $290
93%
#151
FirePro M40003
MSRP: $150|Avg: $72
93%
#152
Radeon Pro 465
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
92%
#154
Tesla P4
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190
92%
#155
Radeon Pro WX 4150
MSRP: $300|Avg: $120
90%
#158
Quadro M2200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $70
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600

#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
94%
#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
92%
#238
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5220%
#253
FirePro W600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $30
100%
#254
L2
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500
96%
#255
FirePro W8100
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200
96%
#256
Quadro K5200
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70
96%
#257
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
94%
#259
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
94%
#260
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
94%
#261
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
93%
#262
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
93%
#264
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
91%
#265
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
88%
#266
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
88%
#267
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
88%
#268
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P400.

InsightQuadro P400FirePro W600
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro W600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $60), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 104.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro P400FirePro W600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+104.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P400 and FirePro W600

NVIDIA

Quadro P400

The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.

AMD

FirePro W600

The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P400 scores 1,659 and the FirePro W600 reaches 1,695 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P400 is built on Pascal while the FirePro W600 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro P400) vs 512 (FirePro W600). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600).

FeatureQuadro P400FirePro W600
G3D Mark Score
1,659
1,695+2%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
512+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.641 TFLOPS
0.768 TFLOPS+20%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
16
32+100%
L1 Cache
96 KB
128 KB+33%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P400FirePro W600
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro P400) vs 256 KB (FirePro W600) — the Quadro P400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P400FirePro W600
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P400) vs 12 (FirePro W600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

FeatureQuadro P400FirePro W600
DirectX
12_1
12
Max Displays
3
6+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P400) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W600). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs UVD 4.0.

FeatureQuadro P400FirePro W600
Encoder
NVENC 6th Gen
VCE 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th Gen
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P400 draws 30W versus the FirePro W600's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P400) vs 350W (FirePro W600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureQuadro P400FirePro W600
TDP
30W-60%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
Unknown
Perf/Watt
55.3+145%
22.6
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P400 launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the FirePro W600 launched at $599 and now averages $30. The FirePro W600 costs 50% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.6 (Quadro P400) vs 56.5 (FirePro W600) — the FirePro W600 offers 104.7% better value. The Quadro P400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureQuadro P400FirePro W600
MSRP
$169-72%
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$60
$30-50%
Performance per Dollar
27.6
56.5+105%
Codename
GP107
Cape Verde
Release
February 7 2017
June 13 2012
Ranking
#741
#732