
Quadro P400 vs FirePro W600

Quadro P400
Popular choices:

FirePro W600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P400 is positioned at rank 143 and the FirePro W600 is on rank 253, so the Quadro P400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P400
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P400.
| Insight | Quadro P400 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $60), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 104.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P400 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+104.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P400 and FirePro W600

Quadro P400
The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.

FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P400 scores 1,659 and the FirePro W600 reaches 1,695 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P400 is built on Pascal while the FirePro W600 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro P400) vs 512 (FirePro W600). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600).
| Feature | Quadro P400 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,659 | 1,695+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 512+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.641 TFLOPS | 0.768 TFLOPS+20% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 128 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P400 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro P400) vs 256 KB (FirePro W600) — the Quadro P400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P400) vs 12 (FirePro W600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P400) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W600). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs UVD 4.0.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P400 draws 30W versus the FirePro W600's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P400) vs 350W (FirePro W600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P400 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | Unknown |
| Perf/Watt | 55.3+145% | 22.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P400 launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the FirePro W600 launched at $599 and now averages $30. The FirePro W600 costs 50% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.6 (Quadro P400) vs 56.5 (FirePro W600) — the FirePro W600 offers 104.7% better value. The Quadro P400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro P400 | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-72% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $30-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.6 | 56.5+105% |
| Codename | GP107 | Cape Verde |
| Release | February 7 2017 | June 13 2012 |
| Ranking | #741 | #732 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












